.

Scot Turner Addresses Cherokee County Board of Education

Scot Turner, Republican Candidate for State House District 21 addressed the Cherokee County School Board regarding education funding and school choice.

 

At the Cherokee County Board of Education meeting on 6/28/12, Republican for State House District 21 Candidate, Scot Turner, addressed the board by making the following statement:

My name is Scot Turner. I am a candidate for the Republican nomination for State House District 21, and I am a product of public schools. I come tonight to answer the recent editorial written by Doctor Petruzielo asking for all legislative candidates to level with the voters on where they stand regarding school funding. 

I want to start by stating I support funding all forms of education to the highest level possible. And when I say all forms, I mean exactly that. 

I stand before you as a member of a community that has been polarized into two groups. Labels like pro public and pro charter have been applied to these two distinct groups, and those groups have been divided and pitted against each other. And tonight, I am calling for an end to that polarization, and I call upon my fellow candidates for public office at all levels to quit the divisive us vs. them rhetoric and focus on what is right by the students.

I don't subscribe to the argument that you have to be in one or the other groups. Standing for parental empowerment and standing in support of traditional public schools are not mutually exclusive concepts. And it is time we recognize the good in each option. 

You will never hear me belittle the traditional public school faculty and staff of CCSD in order to champion parental empowerment because I believe that CCSD is meeting the needs of tens of thousands of students in our county. Likewise, I recognize that options like Cherokee Charter Academy are meeting needs that parents of those children have determined to be a better fit for them. This choice for those parents should not be seen as a knock on CCSD, but instead we all should recognize that there are circumstances when something different is needed. It should be up to the parent to make those decisions.

At this point, to see the elimination of any option in education would be the equivalent to a cut in education spending whether it be in traditional public or charter schools. I will not stand for that. I also will not stand for Cherokee County overpaying in the Local Fair Share portion of QBE. I recognize that it is disingenuous of the State to take more than they are entitled to and then claim that they are sending more to the local school districts year over year.

I also have a real problem with the fact that our current legislature has brought forth a series of budgets and spending programs that have no place in government. While you all have been trying to determine how many furlough days we will have year to year, our legislators were busy spending $19 million on a failed program called go fish, which was supposed to bring in a bevy of tourists to fish in Georgia. 

And even now, they are giving a billionaire a half billion dollars in tax money to fund the construction of a new football stadium that promises to be used about 30 days per year. 

To me, it is a matter of misplaced priorities. These are the projects that compete with education funding. We shouldn't be looking at some educational options as a threat to traditional public schools, we should be looking at wasteful boondoggles like those I just mentioned. They are your culprit, and I promise to fight wasteful spending like those programs so that we can see adequate funding of all options for parents and students.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Anonymous July 04, 2012 at 12:33 AM
This is the type of candidate the people need: Someone who isn't interested in playing political games, but someone who is interested in uniting parents for the good of the children. Everyone wishes that bickering and unworkable polarization would stop... Here is the candidate that will help move education beyond political gaming.
IgnoranceisBliss July 05, 2012 at 06:11 PM
Bravo Scott except 1 thing you are on both sides of the issue. You are a P.A.N.T.S apologist & now a CCA supporter. Unfortunately you can't be on both sides of those issue. PANTS, Frank and If you don't like if move Mike have been the problem all along. Your allegiance to them shows you do not understand that. If you actually had done the research you would see that Frank has been opposed to our legislative delegation before many of the current legislators even took office. Back when he blasted them in support of Roy Barnes in 1999. It is odd that you would call out the legislators if you truly were interested in the kids and not political grandstanding. The fact is Scott if you understood or were even slightly involved you would know that CCSD under Frank certainly has gotten better but what you would also know is that Frank has fought with all of the city councils, county commission and every other form of government in the county but has been give a pass because he was "for the kids". Your selective outrage over the state budget is also amusing. Where were you on the last E-Splost? Why not call out Frank and friends for misguided spending on the new Ps Palace or the wasted $ on noneducation items. You were at the school board after all. Did you go to the capitol & address the budget committee about the school board? Stop grandstanding like an amateur politician
Holly J July 06, 2012 at 01:16 AM
"you can't be on both sides of those issue"- says who?? Who says I can't support traditional public schools while seeing that some charters could offer something different? The issue here is that CCA does not offer anything substantially different from CCSD. Is it simply not the schools those kids are districted to attend. If it were a foreign language immersion school, an IB program, or something truly different, then I say "Carry on!" Smaller classes and "individualized learning plans" are not different- they are luxuries our overcrowded school can't provide. And, any teacher worth his or her salt "individualizes" learning for his/her students. This is not something special about charters. I did it when I taught and every CCSD teacher my child has had so far has done it.
Kelly Anfuso July 06, 2012 at 02:59 AM
CCA offers the Cambridge program which is different and do not see any other district school offering.
No More Bullies July 06, 2012 at 12:43 PM
Cambridge is available in only three grade levels and then only to select students within those grade levels, making it a unique component for 15% of the students?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »